The Supreme Court can't declare an amendment unconstitutional. It's part of the Constitution! What they can do is revisit Heller and rule that the 2A only applies to National Guard elements. This is what liberals would love to see happen.
“What they can do is revisit Heller”
My greatest fear. I do not want this SC getting another shot at this. Last time it was 5-4 and Kennedy was very shaky. We need to tolerate state encroachments until we get at least 1 more conservative Justice. In this atmosphere I can see us losing the 2nd.
There is a precedent of sorts, that would be used if the Ginsburgs et al were to become the majority.The Colarado SC declared a provision of the Colarado Constitution to be unconstitutional and it was accepted by all . There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth but no one suggested that the CST did not have that power. After all, it is the Supreme Court and therefore it is the Last Word on anything and everything. There is no political or legal gainsaying it. That is not how our system was envisioned, but as with so many other facets of Tyranny, that is the present pass. Judges actually rule and the USSC actually rules the judges. The Republic has been set aside by a Judicial oligarchy. Is that a Judiciarchy?
Supreme court declares guns are to be abolished from the citizen, it will be time for the citizens to do an 1812 white house treatment on the supreme court.