Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Thanks for the link, and for clearing up AlbertasChild’s issue about the Entire Controversy Doctrine. I do not contend that the USA v Flynn filings and paperwork were procedurally flawed. My crank theory is that the case we see publically is a deliberate nothing, designed to move Flynn off the chessboard as a foreign policy/security player permanently, without airing things troublesome for the US (including the IC and the Trump administration). Sullivan had no choice but to require Mueller to turn over everything the SC has on Flynn, since the material shared with the court was evidence free.


96 posted on 03/28/2018 8:32:05 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Chewbarkah
-- My crank theory is that the case we see publically is a deliberate nothing, designed to move Flynn off the chessboard as a foreign policy/security player permanently, without airing things troublesome for the US --

Not a bad theory. But Mueller and Strzok and Weissman being jerks also explains the criminal action taken.

Still, entanglements with Turkey may have been troublesome, and "found too late."

-- Sullivan had no choice but to require Mueller to turn over everything the SC has on Flynn, since the material shared with the court was evidence free. --

Judges are all quirky, no two alike. Sullivan is trying to run a tight ship, and if the government fails to turn over excluppatory evidence, that creates a vector and risk for a future appeal. He could have just sentenced Flynn, but it's not in his genes.

97 posted on 03/28/2018 8:39:03 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson