I believe Zecivek held his firearm legally, and Conlon did not.
Were either of the defendants charged with firearms charges separate from the manslaughter/murder charges?
I believe Conlon was charged with firearms offences, and was convicted on those offences.
We're going back a long way here. So this is from memory of what I've been told by sources I'd consider reasonably reliable.
Thanks.
I appreciate your input.
You have a lifetime of experience, while I have only a few short months there.