My premise was stated blatantly in the excerpt I provided.
To wit ...
The fact that the 2,232-page bill was jammed down legislators’ throats
No, that was the statement from the article you disagreed with.
First, the legislators who were given a far too short amount of time to read the bill are not the ones who wrote the legislation.
Second, the bill WAS jammed down the legislators’ throats by the action of not allowing enough time for them to read it before being forced to vote on it.
All of that is what you are disagreeing with. And you are wrong.