It will be interesting to see what evidence is allowed in
In a California court I figure tjis won’t go well
...On Wednesday, a federal judge will hold a “climate science tutorial...
So, man made “climate change” is going to be decided by a court case?
I have as much faith in that as a Court ruling that a
House is haunted “as a matter of law.”
Re: “It will be interesting to see what evidence is allowed in”.
California doesn’t adhere to its Evidence Code.
Ask any husband who has had a Restraining Order filed against them in California by an irate wife in divorce.
Ask any landlord who has also had a tenant file a restraining order on them for alleged abuse that never happened but it will cost thousands of dollars to unwind the false allegation in court.
Ask any farmer who has been hauled into some Environmental kangaroo court for incidental plowing of a man made irrigation runoff pond on their land.
This is nothing but a bald attempt to tax corporations in which all the beneficiaries will be those in the Knowledge Class who are dependent on government largesse. And the courts are part of the Knowledge Class so the corporations will not get a fair trial. California’s pension system needs mega billions of dollars infused into the system in the next four years, including the pensions of judges. So the outcome of the lawsuit is already a fait accompli.
Who will pay for this phony shake down? Everyone who lives in California not corporations.
Well I am interested in a non political scientific debate on climate change.
Start by noting that CO2 has increased in the atmosphere by 13% over the last 30 years yet the temperature is largely flat. Meaning, all their models are dead wrong.