Skip to comments.
China tests driverless tanks that could be powered by artificial intelligence
South China Morning Post / Global Times ^
| Wednesday, 21 March, 2018
| Ma Jun and Shi Liufeng
Posted on 03/20/2018 10:20:16 PM PDT by texas booster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
From Global Times (the official China newspaper:
China's Type 59 is based on the Soviet T-54A tank, which was shipped to China in the 1950s. It can be armed with a 100mm or 105mm cannon and requires a crew of four to operate it, Sputnik News reported on Sunday.
Unmanned tanks are part of the concept of "contactless combat" aided with aggressive intelligent weapons.
In future, unmanned tanks will be able to work on other unmanned platforms, and also integrate information sourced from surveillance satellites, airplanes or submarines.
They will also be capable of continuous combat with greater speed and higher lethality, Liu said. However, Liu added that the unmanned Type 59 based tanks are still in their test phase.
Although the CCTV footage shows the country has managed to operate tanks using remote control, there are still many technical problems that need to be resolved before they can achieve the same combat capabilities as manned tanks.
To: texas booster
Using our money to build up a large military.
If not used today, it will be iteratively improved until quality matches quantity.
Then the war begins.
2
posted on
03/20/2018 10:21:58 PM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: texas booster
I wonder how an AI tank would have responded at Tiananmen Square?
3
posted on
03/20/2018 10:23:58 PM PDT
by
blueplum
( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
To: texas booster
They don”t have to program them to avoid people.
4
posted on
03/20/2018 10:24:51 PM PDT
by
Celerity
To: texas booster
It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop... ever, until you are dead!
To: Celerity
It’s safe to say you can program the exact opposite of Uber vehicles.
To: texas booster
I expect they will still need to be refueled from time to time.
To: Dan Cooper
No crew means it can be powered by nuclear RTGs or other options. Might be a while before you have to refuel them.
8
posted on
03/20/2018 10:40:47 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: texas booster
9
posted on
03/20/2018 10:41:10 PM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: Spktyr
Maybe try the same with M60s and a nuclear fuel cell?
The the war becomes even more of a logistical war, hunting reloaders and refuellers.
10
posted on
03/20/2018 10:44:18 PM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: texas booster
11
posted on
03/20/2018 10:50:17 PM PDT
by
Lean-Right
(Eat More Moose)
To: Lean-Right
Chinese do not care about losing soldiers in a war. They have lots of them
12
posted on
03/20/2018 10:57:47 PM PDT
by
ProudGOP
To: texas booster
Any resemblance to some eschatological wars is purely coincidental, or not? But they sure look like a great solution to dealing with the commute traffic. ! Where can I get one?
13
posted on
03/20/2018 11:02:01 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
To: ProudGOP
I know this. My dad fought in the
forgotten war. Stories of bodies
piled up for protection.
14
posted on
03/20/2018 11:05:52 PM PDT
by
Lean-Right
(Eat More Moose)
To: texas booster
Attempting to catch up with the US.....RIPSAW.
15
posted on
03/20/2018 11:16:23 PM PDT
by
cranked
To: texas booster
Steve Jackson Games should sue. If the Chinese make them big enough, they will be Ogres. Just cover them with biphase carbide armor...
16
posted on
03/20/2018 11:20:27 PM PDT
by
Seraphicaviary
(St. Michael is gearing up. The angels are on the ready line.)
To: texas booster
Then the war begins. Where would they use them? The USA excels at delivering weapons around the world. Same can't be said of China, at least not yet. China could perhaps move them into Korea, India, maybe to Taiwan or Japan. Well, Japan would repel any delivery. I don't think we need to worry about China using tanks against us on our shores.
17
posted on
03/21/2018 12:03:41 AM PDT
by
roadcat
To: Telepathic Intruder
18
posted on
03/21/2018 12:14:10 AM PDT
by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
To: Spktyr
No crew means it can be powered by nuclear RTGs or other options. Might be a while before you have to refuel them.Wouldn't expended ammo and need to resupply be a larger concern ?
19
posted on
03/21/2018 12:25:35 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: texas booster
BS! You’re using an aimbot!
20
posted on
03/21/2018 12:34:26 AM PDT
by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson