“But can we sanction people in *anticipation* of a crime?”
What I am talking about is already a legitimately recognized exception to free speech, among others: incitement. Encouraging violence and, in this case, genocide, is already prohibited. Of course, incitement itself is very narrowly defined in our legal system as conduct that is by its nature an immediate, unquestionable encouragement to violence, not something remote in time and place from, or effect on, the target audience.
A phrase like “gas the Jews” has a special infamous place in history and an unmistakable meaning and purpose. As it happens, I had to do some research regarding my father and came across a letter from the International Red Cross International Tracing Service dated December 21, 1978 which informed my father that they had finally determined that his father was killed at Majdanek on September 25, 1942. Majdanek had just started using its new gas chambers.
I just want Count Dunkula and any fans of his to know: this Jew knows a lot of Jews just like this one that aren’t going to go peacefully next time. If you’ve paid any attention to the Israeli military and clandestine services, Jews can be extremely efficient at eliminating their enemies nowadays.
Understood.But my thinking in *this* particular case is that teaching your dog to do stupid things might not rise to the level of a "threat".Although I'm no lawyer I understand that it is,for example,a crime to communicate a threat to a person...even if you have no intention of carrying out the threat.I don't know if that applies to a group...Jews...Christians...atheists...homosexuals,etc.Perhaps it should be.But if such a law were passed I wonder what the Federal courts would think of it