Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

.
>> Oh, so now it’s not really any expert calculations — it’s just someone looking at a video and saying “that looks like a deliberate demolition to me.” That’s your “overwhelming evidence.” <<

The videos were presented by professional demolition engineers as explanation of what really was happening.

If you like “papers,” there are plenty available at the website, just read them. (zero liklihood)

Your twisted attempt to deflect a well presented explanation is typically weak, but what is expected from deep state Normalcy Nuts like you.

Troll on with your propaganda.
.


122 posted on 03/19/2018 5:15:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
If you like “papers,” there are plenty available at the website, just read them. (zero liklihood)

Well, you're already provably wrong....

It's impossible to address everything on that website in limited space, but here's just two examples of how ridiculous it is, from just one article:

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/199-news-media-events-60-structural-engineers.html

1) The discussion of "thermite" as evidence of controlled demolition is ridiculous, and is self-contradictory. Controlled demolitions use explosives -- extremely fast burning so that the force is delivered simultaneously and/or in very specific time sequences. But thermite doesn't work like that. It is a slow burn that would cause irregular and imprecise timing of structural failures. Which directly contradicts the supposed theory of a "controlled demolition". Nor was there any attempt to explain how someone could possibly manage to get inside the structural framing of two fully-finished building to apply thermite directly to the steel supports anyway without being noticed. It's ludicrous.

2) The (repeated elsewhere) claim of "Angular momentum arrested". The problem with this is that it is just as applicable to the pancake theory as to a theory of controlled demolition. To put it differently, "how can even a controlled demolition arrest angular momentum?" It's an alleged anomaly that isn't suggestive of anything.

I'd point out that the only named author for that particular article is "James McDowell". Nowhere does it list any of his qualifications, background, or education. He's not even listed in the "who we are" on the websites homepage.

131 posted on 03/20/2018 6:57:36 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson