Not enough to compensate for the spending and lost revenue. The only time tax cuts actually did that was in the 1960’s, and then only for a while. The national debt exploded under Reagan and Bush 41 got left holding the bag. Coolidge is the best President to look to for how to do these things. You cut taxes AND cut spending.
You are off topic on tax cuts and you are also incorrect.
Cutting taxes has always increased revenue. Spending is a separate and distinct issue.
Spending is the problem, alone, not cutting taxes.
The tax cuts pay for themselves if gdp = 2.4%. A gdp higher will bring in more revenue than if the tax cuts didn’t happen. Mulvany had the dynamic analysis done, and that is what he said. I believe him. See Laffer curve.
Regan cut taxes and total revenue almost doubled. But Tip Oneal lied and increased spending.
Demand side economics is discredited. Paul Krugman and followers are flat out wrong.
There is no lost revenue.