I jumped to conclusions when I read the actual title. I was wrong to assume the poster changed the title.
However, someone at the Examiner should have changed the URL to fit the title and the essence of the article.
Like many other posters, when I read the given title I was outraged to learn that Sessions decided to give McCabe a pass -— until I read the article with the true title and was flustered.
I think they tend to keep the URL, so any pages that display the article (many of which are "outside" the publisher) are not affected by editing any part of the article, including the title.
URL and photo URLs can be informative and even humorous.
I'm totally with you on the misleading headline disease. I just assume the headlines are false or misleading.