Folks, if you go to the Ryan PAC site, you’ll see it supports Saccone.
The PAC may have engaged in a little “negative” campaigning by reminding liberal Democrats in the district that Lamb claims to support the 2A. Such information would depress liberal Democrats from voting.
I don’t know if that happened, but if the PAC actually put out information on Lamb regarding guns, that would be the reason.
Calm.
“The PAC may have engaged in a little negative campaigning by reminding liberal Democrats in the district that Lamb claims to support the 2A. Such information would depress liberal Democrats from voting.”
That was my first thought, too. A mailer aimed at Dims to remind them “are you really going to vote for a gun rights candidate [Lamb] after that terrible school shooting?”
If that was the intent by Ryan’s PAC, the best outcome it could have had in a general election was to get some of the Dims to stay home.