They may be conflicted over a new Cold War, but there's no way they're conflicted over Putin. They love that guy.
Of course I know many Putin fanboys who, if pressed, will more or less admit that Russias elections are not fair and the system is biased towards Putin. Usually they deflect by asking Who else is there? But you see- thats the problem. If Putin were ever a good leader, even during the years when things were on the up and up, he would have at least had the prescience to understand that hes not immortal and he should probably construct Russias state institutions so as to ensure stable, democratic succession long after his death, incapacitation, or retirement. In general, he would use his authority to build a system based on rule of law and some kind of values as opposed to a cult of personality surrounding himself. He barely toyed with the concept back in 2008 when he let Medvedev take the reins, but he was so paranoid and concerned with image that he decided to come back to the presidency early.
The ultimate result of this is that wherever you fall on the spectrum of Putin/anti-Putin, theres really no getting around the fact that sooner or later Russia is fucked, and theres really nobody to blame for that but Putin. Therefore I cant really understand why he still has Western admirers today. I do get the ones who just hate their own governments, have no experience with Russia, and just absorb a steady diet of bullshit from RT, Sputnik, and pro-Kremlin sites. But I dont get the people who work for outlets like that and continue to defend the man and his system. Even if we foolishly attributed all the positive things in the mid-2000s to Putin, all of that has either been negated or on the chopping block to be negated within the coming years. All I can think of is that the Western apologists do it for the money. Those who dont are complete idiots. There just is no other explanation.
Jim Kovpak