I’m more than content to wait and see how things play out. It’s not like the opinions of posters on an anonymous internet forum are going to matter one way or the other.
But one thing I assuredly will not be doing is taking anything printed by the execrable “voice of conservatism” National Review with any less than a large container of salt. (The occasional on-target work of Andrew McCarthy being the only possible exception).
NRO and Q have the same credibility quotient.
Keep believing the Trump presidency is a hoax, tool. Until it isn’t.
All of this BS and speculation reminds me of one or two columns written by the late conservative columnist William Safire during the Whitewater/Lewinski investigations. He claimed, on the "highest authority", that Clinton was going to be formally accused of a great mass of high crimes centering on massive abuse of power. Then it turned out to be nothing but a two bit perjury rap. The point of the story being that nobody knows until he knows.