their constitutional right to a stable climate. Which amendment is that?
“their constitutional right to a stable climate. “ Oh, it must be annotated right next to abortion rights and the requirement to possess a government issued authorization to keep and bear arms. I see. Somebody’s been in the coke bowl again.
This must be the Californistan version of the Constitution. I can't find this right in my version Must be Amendment 9 3/4 the same one that also gives rights to unicorns.
” suing the U.S. government for not doing enough to protect their constitutional right to a stable climate.”
News Flash! - That’s not the Government’s job.
What’s with these people? I think it’s time to give
the MMPI test to these Judges. Failure of the test would
not surprise me, and ..... they should be removed upon such
results. Promptly removed!
The Clowns of the Ninth Circus at work again.
This would be hilarious if it was satire; but sadly, actual judges appointed to an actual federal court actually did this.
Constitutional right to a stable climate? The whole 9th. should be hauled off in straitjackets.
A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday in favor of 21 children and young adults suing the U.S. government for not doing enough to protect their constitutional right to a stable climate.
—
The left is just certifiably insane. What’s next, their “constitutional right” not to have anything they believe challenged? Oh, wait . . . they already think they have that.
This could be a blessing in disguise.
In order to win a suit like this you have to provide proof you were harmed.
Let’s see what ‘proof’ they can provide that global warming exists...
So the ninth rules that citizens of California can’t ur the state if the state government refuses to honor prop 8 or even defend it after it was legally enacted because they somehow don’t have standing.
But the ninth rules children have standing to sue Trump for not controlling Mother Nature? (Which is neither a constitutional protection or right or power that the government can enforce so how can the people sue?!)
It’s madness and insanity.
There is a Constitutional Right to weather?
Must be in the fine print....
Let’s not even get into the FACT that regulating the climate to be 72 degrees will have massively catastrophic events worldwide!
You want climate change damage? You can’t get the ninth to let children sue California for taking in millions of illegals which led, directly, to the water shortage and more pollution. (As if millions of citizens won’t drain your reservoirs faster)
Nooo... that’d be hateful....
If one can sue for disrupting the climate, then one can also sue for disrupting the economy or for disrupting our national security by not doing enough to deter foreign threats, punish domestic crimes or enforce our borders.
And one can sue any branch of government, past or present.
So if this stands, then let all these suits commence!
“their constitutional right to a stable climate”
Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Washington and Franklin must be turning over in their graves.
Pure retardation.
They say that judges’ decisions are constrained by the desire to not be overturned on appeal. Seems to me that the 9th Circus disproves that contention.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
I remember when the courts claimed that state government officials didn’t have the standing to sue Obama to prove his claim of natural born citizenship.
And it remains that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to police the environment.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Consider that the main reason that the country is still cursed with the activist 9th Circuit Court is the following imo.
All roads of corruption in federal and state government's lead to the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress imo.
In the case of the infamous 9th Circuit Court, although Congress has always had the constitutional authority to stop the Constitution-ignoring shenanigans of that court, it has stubbornly refused to do so.
This is why patriots now need to be making sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting, state sovereignty-respecting patriot candidates on the 2018 primary ballots, patriots who will be willing to clean up the federal courts, and pink-slip career lawmakers by sending patriot candidate lawmakers to DC on election day.
And until the states wake up and repeal 17A, as evidenced by concerns about the integrity of Alabama's special Senate election, patriot candidates need to win elections by a large enough margin to compensate for possible deep state ballot box fraud and associated MSM scare tactics.
Hacking Democracy - The Hack
Which will be overturned by the Supreme Court. What a joke the ninth is.