High five to him.
Very interesting!
I wonder who is funding this?
If the bakery has to bake the cake, then Dicks has to sell the rifle.
Let them suffer under the same tyranny they voted for.
The first thing I thought of when I heard about these policy changes was how are they legal?
You cannot discriminate in commerce based on age. I predicted right here that Dick’s would get sued for millions. Such idiots!! I am so glad!! Who ever was their lawyer has big mal practice problems.
If Dick's and Walmart said "no gun sales to anyone over 50" no one would think they could get away with such blatant age discrimination, yet people seem to think they can here.
You have to treat people equally under the law. If state law says a product is legal for anyone over 18, you can't still sell the product and say no to people 18, 19 and 20. If you could, it could be any arbitrary age for anything - no alcohol for those under 37 - a store sells.
I personally think a business should be able to deny sales to anyone they want for any reason they want, but in a country where the courts say public accommodation laws are constitutional and (maybe) a baker has to make some homosexuals' rainbow-colored gay wedding cake even if it's not a style on offer, than this doesn't fly. Either pull the product entirely or sell to every legal customer.
Godspeed, Mr. Watson!
I wish he was living in Indiana where he’d have a MUCH better chance of winning. Oregon is a liberal wasteland. Great luck to him though. Doing God’s work.
If I remember correctly, the arguments are in the cases preceding the vote for 18-year-olds.
Rather, the legislators’ arguments preceding the vote for 18-year-olds.
He can buy his guns elsewhere. He shouldn’t be able to force Dicks to sell him a gun and homos shouldn’t be able to force Christians to bake them a cake. He should go to a mom and pop gun store where he will be treated like a man and he won’t have to act like a jerk.
I wonder if Dick’s sells hunting licenses those under 21?
If Dick’s determined that 20 yrs old is too young to buy a gun, then I can’t see how they could sell them a hunting license.
Doesn’t an FFL dealer have the right/obligation to refuse to sell a firearm to anyone they feel is not appropriate - for any reason?
(Gut feeling, something not right, etc??)
Although doing so based solely on age doesn’t seem right.
I knew this would happen and rightly so. He can vote, so the entire Bill of Rights applies to him, period. No question, open and shut case...