Posted on 03/06/2018 6:00:14 AM PST by outpostinmass2
Why are children being subjected to a mentally ill principal? It is tragic for parents to have to explain this bizarre behavior to young children.
Reality? Most of the parents said, "This guy has issues. Keep him away from my kid." Guy gets put on indefinite leave, and slinks out the back door, likely never to return. But that doesn't support the media narrative.
I feel sorry for his wife and kids.
As long as his DNA shows him to be male, he IS a he. A pervert, degenerate and a deviant, to be certain, with NO legitimate reason to be anywhere near children.
My advise is to drink heavily.
New theory:
This guy is going to use “mental incompetence” to avoid being prosecuted for some crime that is about to be exposed and is laying the groundwork for that now.
“It’s always paid leave.”
That’s just ridiculous. Even the Ma. parents of Swampscott can’t stand this fool.
Parents should hook him up to the pickup truck and teach him what “drag” really means.
“After quitting drinking in November, Daniels began dressing female more often at home, buying more womens clothes, and joined a transgender support group.”
Somebody buy him some liquor...
“The purpose of hiring a trans principal is to force the kids to accept the deviancy”.
Good grief read the article. They did not hire a transgender. They hired a guy to do the job and a few days ago showed up as a women.
This is good. All we (normal deplorables) have to do is to continue to refuse to accept this nonsense. Refuse to let the insane raise your children. Refuse to give perverts access to them. Refuse them safe haven. Do not accept them.
Don’t let this mentally ill person near children. Who knows what will (has) happen???
If I began daily dressing like Abe Lincoln and told everyone that I was Abe Lincoln, I would be dubbed insane—rightly so. This man is mentally disturbed, and should never be allowed to work around children again.
IT looks like Mr. Lippman from Seinfeld.
Oh I don’t know.
I think its reaction to actually being referred to as “IT” would be something special!
On second thought, calling him “it” instead of the correct pronoun is probably more derogatory. So I’m in.
“On second thought, calling him it instead of the correct pronoun is probably more derogatory.”
Actually, I think “it” is the perfect solution to the “personal pronoun problem”. Spread it far and wide!
Good for the parents, there is still hope, even in MA.
oh....my....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.