Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Tariff Scolds Are Rejecting Reagan’s Steel Protection Legacy
Breitbart ^ | March 2, 2018 | by JOHN CARNEY

Posted on 03/03/2018 11:41:44 AM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/03/2018 11:41:44 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

And the tariff on Japanese motorcycles to keep Harley Davidson in business.


2 posted on 03/03/2018 11:54:53 AM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The increased cost of beer cans and auto chassis will be more than made up for by less unemployment, welfare, etc


3 posted on 03/03/2018 11:56:19 AM PST by Ceebass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Any additional costs due to tariffs have already been more than offset by cutting corporate taxes and slashing billions of dollars of regulations.


4 posted on 03/03/2018 12:01:12 PM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

More proof that the “republicans” sold out long ago. Look who they stand up for, not the USA.


5 posted on 03/03/2018 12:04:09 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton
Tariffs were the main source of revenue for the federal government from 1789 to 1914. During this period, there was vigorous debate between the various political parties over the setting of tariff rates. In general Democrats favored a tariff that would pay the cost of government, but no higher. Whigs and Republicans favored higher tariffs to protect and encourage American industry and industrial workers. Since the early 20th century, however, U.S. tariffs have been very low and have been much less a matter of partisan debate.

SOURCE

6 posted on 03/03/2018 12:13:57 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

To be fair they also scolded Reagan.


7 posted on 03/03/2018 12:19:33 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

There’s no need for tariffs if there is fair trade. Trump is a fighter. Where he sees unfair trade he’ll impose tariffs. And we’ve been taking a screwing on trade without fighting back for a long time.


8 posted on 03/03/2018 12:40:37 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Trump risked his wealth for our country. Clinton risked our country for her wealth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

the only time i see Ben Sasse’s name in the press is when he is attacking Trump.

seriously.

this guy wants to pretend to be a hero for the Constitution, but somehow he ends up being a modern day McInsane.

hey ben, you got a problem with the president and leader of your party? be a grown up and discuss it with him. don’t go to the media and publicly attack him.

what a baby.


9 posted on 03/03/2018 12:41:29 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It’s NOT just a case of ECONOMICS!

It’s also a case for the societal HEALTH of our fellow Americans.

It’s no surprise that the drug crisis has hit hardest in the blue collar areas of American(the rust belt)

I’d rather pay a little more for my next truck and see that”big beautiful “Made In America” emblem stamped on it than spend millions, nay BILLIONS on welfare, workfare or drug rehabilitation programs when all is needed is give a man(or woman) the satisfaction of working hard and seeing the fruits of their labor.

We, as a nation used to understand this.

May President Trump relight this flame again and truly:

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN”


10 posted on 03/03/2018 12:45:17 PM PST by RedMonqey ("You don't tug on Superman's cape...You don't spit into the wind...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The globalists be damned. Tariffs are a tool! Can be used for good or bad. Trump smart on this one!
11 posted on 03/03/2018 12:48:04 PM PST by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

Chinese have soft slavery and ecological spoliation to be able to do it.


12 posted on 03/03/2018 12:51:53 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ceebass

All things will adjust. But most of all, morale. There will be more work in the work, so to speak.


13 posted on 03/03/2018 12:54:02 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

George Washington put tariffs on British shipping, I guess the rino’s would have scolded him too.


14 posted on 03/03/2018 12:54:35 PM PST by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Beg pardon? Be specific.


15 posted on 03/03/2018 12:54:41 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Oh sorry. Sasse and company.

Those whose oxen stand to be most immediately gored may be speaking up first. Understandable.


16 posted on 03/03/2018 1:00:57 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

The whole point of band-aid politics seems to be to discourage America to act as a team. Nebraska sells less cattle to China now. Bad thing. But then workers in domestic steel industry start eating more steak. Good thing.


17 posted on 03/03/2018 1:03:41 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Back when we had limited, Constitutional government that didn’t require taxing the citizenry?


18 posted on 03/03/2018 1:09:05 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

Yeah... With tariffs.

Now we can’t completely shut all doors to the world. Some marvelous things are possible through international collaboration. Modern technology needs Chinese mining. But depending on other countries for common staple items is stupid.


19 posted on 03/03/2018 1:13:34 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Yeah, it's a real “economic mirage” when a nation can literally poison the sky and pay pennies on a dollar(yen?) to achieve “superpower economy”. And I'm not wild about helping a Commie enemy build their ships at the expense of our workers.

We were sold on the ideal that a thriving Chinese economy would ultimate doom the Communist hegemony over it's people.

Instead it has only “fatten” the bloodsucking ticks and it's leader-for-life Xi Jinping apparently.

Another “great ideal” sold to us by the Clinton-Bush” dynasty.

I say, Trump, “Tear down this (Chinese )wall”

20 posted on 03/03/2018 1:19:41 PM PST by RedMonqey ("You don't tug on Superman's cape...You don't spit into the wind...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson