Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace
Even if he knew the correct speeds (he doesn’t) at 30 feet, the time difference would be less than 1/10,000 of a second. Idiot.

Do be honest even I can figure out this idiot didn't mean muzzle velocity but rate of fire. He was too dumb to state it correctly.

How he came to that conclusion escapes me because every TV show clearly demonstrates that full auto ARs users, who never hit anything, are always brought down by 9 mil hand gun users.

36 posted on 02/27/2018 9:11:01 AM PST by itsahoot (There will be division, as long as there is money to be divided.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: itsahoot

www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/lawrence-the-president-lives-in-a-fantasy-world-1168220227914


38 posted on 02/27/2018 9:53:23 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: itsahoot

O’Donnell claims 3200fps, when it is usually between 2300 and 2700fps. A Glock 34 is a little less than 1,400fps.

So, using the higher numbers for both, the bullet from the AR-15 takes 0.0111 seconds to travel 30 feet.

The bullet from the Glock 34 takes 0.0214 seconds, or about 1/100 of a second longer.

BTW, using the slower speed of 2300fps, the AR-15 takes 0.01314 sec.


40 posted on 02/27/2018 10:07:54 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson