So the SCOTUS simply refused to jump in until the appeals court has had its say
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
That is the way I read it...
Better make sure it is done correctly rather than give ‘them’ automatic outs and arguments.
What I have ‘trouble’ comprehending is it was done by EO and even the signer said it probably wouldn’t last, why can’t it be taken down the same way THEN go after it legally to ensure it lasting.
Sort of like Roe-Wade.. Since it followed all the procedures, it makes it almost impossible to upend.
Sometimes we have to be careful what we wish for...Get RvW upended and what do the libs do to counter it?
THEY spent every waking hour for 8 years trying to impeach W for ‘payback’ for Clintoon and that quest is till on going...
Until they get a ‘head on a stake’, this crap will continue. A waste of time, money and effort YET, these so called Representatives damn sure are NOT representing the ‘masses’.
>
Better make sure it is done correctly rather than give ‘them’ automatic outs and arguments.
>
Correctly? It’s an ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL EO. It was illegally EXTENDED by Trump.
Now we have the Exec & Judic. playing ‘bend over the Republic’ because *NEITHER* will follow/enforce the Constitution a/o Rule of Law.
>
Sort of like Roe-Wade.. Since it followed all the procedures, it makes it almost impossible to upend.
>
This, too, is a ‘whole-cloth’ fiction. Upend = States, per 9th & 10th telling Fedzilla to FOAD, as is their right.
Only reason it’s ‘impossible’ is because of the house-of-cards built up around SCOTUS being the ‘final arbiter’ (when though/when they overstep their authority) [HINT: We the People are the arbiters. Govt is OUR creation. WE tell it, not the other way around].
That's the troubling part. I understand their reasoning about letting cases work through the system, but not when the precipitating event is blatantly unconstitutional as was Bathhouse Barry's DACA EO. This is just more confirmation that Mark Levin is correct in calling us a post-constitutional America.