To: sukhoi-30mki
Nice, great anti-air capability, but who’s going to bomb Finland? If the Russkis get frisky again they’ll just walk in and take it!
2 posted on
02/22/2018 7:58:52 AM PST by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Strictly speaking as a long retired submarine sailor not acquainted with surface ships, I’d say this is a pretty safe ship - I don’t see how you could fall off in a storm since everything is inside.
3 posted on
02/22/2018 8:06:23 AM PST by
New Jersey Realist
( (Be Nice To Your Kids. They Will Pick Out Your Nursing Home))
To: sukhoi-30mki
Why would the Finnish Nave need ice breakers? Was Al Gore wrong?
4 posted on
02/22/2018 8:07:24 AM PST by
thorvaldr
To: sukhoi-30mki
6 posted on
02/22/2018 8:27:06 AM PST by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: sukhoi-30mki
"Finland is in the middle of a competition to select a new anti-ship missile to replace its existing Swedish-made RBS-15 Mk IIs and Boeing’s Harpoon is just one potential option. The other contenders are the RBS-15 Mk III+ from Sweden’s Saab Bofors Dynamics, the Naval Strike Missile (NSM) from Norway’s Kongsberg, and latest iteration of the European missile consortium MBDA’s Exocet MM40. "Finland has selected the Israel Aerospace Industries-developed Gabriel anti-ship missile to replace its current MTO85M system.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
