These TV kids should be asked this question:
Should the shooter be executed?
My guess is that many would say no. That would be indicative of rejecting common sense laws to prevent shootings.
Good Read!
This is NOT what the Constitution says, and it is a consistent propaganda move by liberals to try to re-frame the amendment as to only relating to militias.
Here is what the Constitution actually says:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Notice the ONE comma in the actual 2nd amendment, and the two extra commas in the liberal revision. This changes the meaning to imply that they are talking only about militias, not the general citizenry.
That is what the Heller case was all about, and Townhall still tried to push that bogus version past us.
Picture this scenario; a state governor senses the need to call for a militia and unarmed folks show up. Now all he has to do is to request funding from the state legislators to arm, train, and organize a militia.
Ultima Ratio Regum And The Second Amendment
This is the reason why the final argument of kings in America rests in the hands of citizens, not because of some slavish devotion to violence and gun culture, but because the final argument does not and should never rest in the hands of either government’s enforcers or our self-determined superiors, but ourselves alone.
My argument against “gun control?”
Molon labe.
5.56mm
My favorite argument to use on anti gun morons is GFY.