Well said.
There is a great disparity in the application of the law regarding the free speech clause.
Just to touch on the basics:
Though their client base may only number in the hundreds a mom and pop bakery, a restaurant or a wedding photographer must serve all who wish to buy their products or services.
Even when the business owners disagree with or disapprove of the customer for any reason at all.
And even when there are other comparable businesses providing the same products or services.
But a social media enterprise serving milions upon millions can refuse service to anyone they disagree with or disapprove of for any reason at all.
Even though there are no other comparable options for the customer.
As an example: If your customer base, friends, fans or associates communicate primarilly on Facebook and you are barred there are no other comparable options.
It's something like saying only certain people can have a TV or a telephone, or use UPS or FED-EX or the US Post Office.
But it is much worse.
Yes it is. It is far more impactful upon the election process.