No, but you obviously have some unfulfilled Pharma needs.
Strac6, everyone who has read your posts knows what you represent. The fact that you would deny that lawyers, in general, don’t believe in objective truth and/or principle, says a lot about you. Anyone who has spoken to an honest lawyer will be told exactly that. The default position in your profession is that rights and laws come from Courts and the government, not from God. Anyone who has spent any amount of time in a Courtroom knows that the whole point is to prevail, not to reveal facts and truth. That is why Democrats and the Republican establishment find it so easy to ignore their oath of office. They are by and large attorneys with zero principles, for whom original intent is maybe a remotely interesting concept to be contemplated a some point in the distant future, if at all. These are the kinds of candidates you think to be preferable, because they get all the big money, positive media, and support from your establishment buddies.
All that said, I am curious why you would play down the concept that virtually all of these school shootings seem to have a Pharma link. Many of us in the pro-gun movement see this as a real concern. Saying that the shooter is just nuts (as opposed to over-medicated) plays right into the narrative that we need gun control to protect our youth.