9th Circus again. I was under the impression that appellate courts ruled on the law, not on the basis of "common sense understandings" with not a single shred of evidence to back them up.
“common sense understandings”
In other words, their personal prejudices.
“9th Circus again. I was under the impression that appellate courts ruled on the law, not on the basis of “common sense understandings” with not a single shred of evidence to back them up. “
You could have shortened your respone to the first sentence!
The Nutty Ninth never used “the law” for many of their wacked out decisions. “Common sense understandings” without evidence is like saying that the “world is flat” because some ships never come back and they had to have fallen off of it.