[backwoods-engineer]

Good point. Once is all I'll ever vote for the man.

Since this is Trump Central, and apparently no longer a 2nd-Amendment-friendly forum, I think I'll take a break from FR. Maybe a permanent one. I'm sure y'all would love that.

[palmer]

Ironically, the second amendment is the reason we don't need to fight to keep the second amendment and other amendments. The governments of other countries incrementally revoke the freedoms of their populations, just as you would probably say Trump is doing by "banning" bumostocks.

But let me put these two ideas to you. The bumpstocks are unlikely to be banned, just their sale. You will still be able to 3-d print one and use it.

Here's a more important consideration: what good is a bumpstock against an army? There's a case to be made that any weapon can be used to fight for freedom against an army. Single shot handguns were air-dropped into France so Frenchmen could use them to kill their occupiers and take their much better weapons.

But a bumpstock? You really think a bumpstock is going to help in any possible way in the fight for freedom?