Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom

If you had the ability to read and research you would know California has over 7 million single family detached homes.

Over 80% owner-occupied.

Only Texas comes close with a little over 5 million. Florida has less than 4 million and New York barely over 2 million.

Given home prices in CA, how is that not the largest, most affluent middle class in the nation?


14 posted on 02/19/2018 10:56:53 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner
Housing

Housing units, July 1, 2016, (V2016) 14,060,525

Housing units, April 1, 2010 13,680,081

Owner-occupied housing unit rate, 2012-2016 54.1%

Median value of owner-occupied housing units, 2012-2016 $409,300

Median selected monthly owner costs -with a mortgage, 2012-2016 $2,157

Median selected monthly owner costs -without a mortgage, 2012-2016 $517

Median gross rent, 2012-2016 $1,297

19 posted on 02/19/2018 11:04:56 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Large, because the population is large. A smaller proportion of a huge population is still huge.
But the proper metric is proportion, not an absolute number.


20 posted on 02/19/2018 11:05:24 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

In raw numbers, CA may have the largest, most affluent middle class. But that ignores several things: First, as a percentage of the state population and in comparison to the upper and lower classes, where does CA stand when measured against other states?

And as for “affluent”, how affluent are they once you start taking cost-of-living into account? Are those homeowners really that affluent? If you leave out home valuation since buyers are scarce and most don’t have the ability to pay what the market portrays as home values, are any CA residents really flush with cash? Or do they just look “affluent” on paper because they own a house with an unrealistically high “value”?


32 posted on 02/19/2018 11:15:59 AM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

The article refers to proportion, not absolute numbers.

If you were to look at absolute numbers, you would find that CA has the largest poverty class in the country. This goes hand-in-hand with the proportion.

For CA to be on a par with the national average, another 8% of the population would have to be lifted out of poverty. But CA politicians will do everything they can to grow the poverty class while driving out the middle class.

As I asked, don’t CA schools teach math or deductive reasoning any more?

It’s a real shame to see what has happened to CA. People often ask if I plan to return when I retire, and my answer is always no, because CA is insane now. The cost of living is sky-high, while the quality of life just keeps plummeting. And economic and social illiterates run Sacto.


33 posted on 02/19/2018 11:17:18 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson