[Strac6]

The intent of 18 U.S.C. § 875 is directed against those who would profit from such threats, as opposed to just the threat itself.

Secondly, Def would argue that Def did not (to the best of my knowledge) name a specific person (individual) to be injured, law would not apply.

Not saying there is not a prosecute-able crime, but there would be some specific defenses.... and “word crimes’ are always tough to prosecute.

Finally, SAs in Florida, are chasing known, real crooks who have already committed federal crimes, plus terrorists, plus Cuban intel officers who have infiltrated South Florida.

In the real world, they don’t have time to chase every “word crime”, but they certainly should have called Broward SO.

[dragnet2]

Whoa, wait a minute there Mr. Strac.

So according to you, if I go on the Internet in Florida and threaten to shoot up a school and post it on a site origination out of Alabama, there is no federal crime?

??

[dragnet2]

Whoa, wait a minute there Mr. Strac.

So according to you, if I go on the Internet in Florida and threaten to shoot up a school and post it on a site origination out of Alabama, there is no federal crime?

Really?

[dragnet2]

Btw, that was one of the most convoluted responses I've ever seen to one of my comments.☺