I can honestly say I’d rather have U.S. Senator Mitt Romney than U.S. Senator Evan McMullin, and Romney’s running essentially ends the idea of a Senator McMullin in 2019.
I don't think I agree with you there.
Let's stipulate two things. First, both are Never Trumpers of the first order of magnitude. Second, neither is a conservative. Neither is a Reagan Republican, a constitutionalists, or whatever term you want to use.
It comes down to their pol;icy positions. While neither would be that good, I think we'd get more votes we like from a Senator McMullin than from a Senator Romney.
Ideologically, Romney is Susan Collins -- a very liberal Republican. Still better than a Dhimmicrap, but not by a lot. Ideologically, McMullin seems more like Al D'Amato. Not a conservative, but a "moderate" type who voted our way more often than the Collins types do.
I'd rather have the D'Amato type than the Collins type, based on voting record. I'd rather have a real conservative than either of them, but if that's the choice, I'm taking the D'Amato type.
I can say that i’d rather have Willard than Hillary or Hitler or Obama but i’d have to think twice b4 voting and it sure doesn’t make him any easier to stomach.If he wants to be a senator why can’t he run again in his own state instead of carpetbagging in like Hillary. He’ll probably have to commute a lot to campaign there so it’s sad that these guys can get people to start cheering for brain cancer and plane crashes.
Where’s a meme of Romney/Hillary carpetbagging in together?