Property rights are more important than free speech rights. Property rights are human rights according to Milton Friedman.
I vacillate between the two. I think we both agree they are pretty darned important and basic.
The idea that some goofy council and mayor can pass a law saying that someone, if they are a “specially recognized artistic force” can apply their art to your property and you don’t have a right to remove it is absolutely preposterous.
Ignoring the obvious rights issues, art is subjective. What one man likes, another loathes. e.g. I’m not into Punk.