Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second U.S. judge blocks Trump administration from ending DACA program
Reuters ^ | February 13, 2018 | by Dan Levine

Posted on 02/13/2018 1:34:28 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

A second U.S. judge on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump’s decision to end a program that protects immigrants brought to the United States illegally as children from deportation.

U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis in Brooklyn ruled that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, cannot end in March as planned, a victory for state attorneys general and immigrants who sued the Republican administration.

The plaintiffs had argued that the administration violated federal law by cutting off a program that hundreds of people relied on with little explanation.

In the ruling on Tuesday, Garaufis said the Trump administration could eventually rescind the DACA program. However, the reasons it gave last year for winding down the program were too arbitrary and could not stand, the judge said.

Garaufis ordered the government to process both initial requests for DACA status, as well as renewals, on the same terms as had been in place before the administration made its announcement last September.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: border; daca; illegalaliens; invasion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: egfowler3

There was never a eo from obama or trump. just policy.


61 posted on 02/13/2018 6:15:46 PM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s getting dangerous when lawless commands come down from the courts. This sort of nonsense could lead to places that no one sensible wants to go.


62 posted on 02/13/2018 6:19:16 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

When these very Stoopid jurists show themselves to be BAD, why are they forever left on the bench?

after the supremes explain that this is crappola, why isn’t this biased dumbass removed?
or placed in stocks and stoned?


63 posted on 02/13/2018 7:56:40 PM PST by Joe Boucher (President Trump makes obammy look like the punk he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

Agreed - the courts found it to be unconstitutional. Obama’s order was and is illegal and, as such, can’t be sustained.

Both judges rulings are tantamount to seditious actions - ordering the President to do an illegal thing.


64 posted on 02/13/2018 8:34:14 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The older a activist on the bench gets, the more willing they are to say stupid stuff that SCOTUS will overturn.


65 posted on 02/14/2018 3:23:41 AM PST by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...;-})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson