Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
What is sold may be un-sold, and this one needs to be. As far as formulation, we could try something like:

...nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The USSC has only been able to avoid tossing this entire body of law out by carefully restricting what it is willing to consider regarding the matter. Congress has the ability to take it out of their scope (Article III, Section 2) if they continue to do so.

46 posted on 02/13/2018 11:12:47 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill

An accurate and coherent picture of the evils resulting from this kind of thing will need to be beheld by the American people at large, and they will have to care about it too.

The good Lord help us. Personally I think the whole idea of even using it to dampen down clandestine street drug trade has got bad problems. The interdiction rate is pretty dismal, about 10% for marijuana. Police may not even WANT to see people convicted that they can “tax” instead. If sending a lot of dealers to jail kills the golden goose for them, they won’t want that.

This is an exercise in building little private kingdoms in the name of looking like something is being done about a problem while not doing very much about it.


49 posted on 02/13/2018 11:30:30 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson