“Why would she still thinking about that meeting 15 days after it occurred and she was going out the door?”
And why would she do it 15 MINUTES after she was no longer employed by the White House? I wonder if there’s any legal significance to that.
The legal significance is that it is evidence that might be used to prosecute her, though her defense lawyers would use it to try to exonerate her.
It appears right now that Rice may have been manufacturing CYA evidence for herself and BHO. The reason for this is that there probably is other evidence that shows how involved they were in the illegal activities against candidate and President-elect Trump. In the event that this was discovered, they needed something (1) to deflect their culpability to some “rogue” investigators and lawyers who “did not lawfully operate” as BHO “instructed” them and (2) to support the narrative that BHO had legitimate, legal concerns that Russia influenced the election by colluding with Trump. But why, how and when they manufactured this piece of evidence is the hook into their skin that just won’t let go.