Now she claims to be concerned that the court might be considered partisan?
After she spent her entire career as an ultra-left partisan, doing her best to politicize the court?
Ginsberg quotes about Trump:
Interview July 8, 2016 with New York Times
“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”
“Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand.”
Interview July 11, 2016 with CNN
“He is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ...
“At first I thought it was funny,” she said of Trump’s early candidacy. “To think that there’s a possibility that he could be president ….
She’s got no more honor or credibility than people like Al Sharpton, Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, Maxine Waters or Barack Obama.
If she had any ethics, she would recuse herself from every decision that came before the court that involved the Trump Administration, or person associated with Trump, or any person whoever publicly supported Trump.
After all Ruth, one of your coherts, a partisan federal judge can order a national injunction against the President for his alleged statements made as a candidate, then you too Ruth must be prevented from participating in such decisions. Probably more so.