Posted on 02/10/2018 8:08:41 AM PST by MarvinStinson
Hag, that smut is not “revelations”.
Feinsteins analysis concludes that the criminal referral fails to make a case that Steele actually lied o the FBI.
That’s not the standard. No one has refuted that Hillary killed Vince Foster, either.
Her comments on the matter that make her sound like a somewhat sensible adult in the past are causing her problems with her re-election campaign, so she’s realized she needs to abandon it.
Nothing refuted, eh? Like someone being alleged to be holding meetings in a foreign country when it has been proven they were in fact not there? Absurd.
Someone needs to write up a crazy dossier on frau feinstein.
If she can’t prove its not true.. than it must be true.
Dingbat.
Not a single allegation in the dossier has been PROVEN. There’s no need to refute blatant lies.
Nor has any revelation in the Nunez memo, Dianne. So where does that get us?
Or the common knowledge that Feinstein accepts bribes, and sleeps with her driver.
... and you haven’t yet proved there are no unicorns.
More importantly, nothing has been confirmed.
Fist off, what she said isn’t true. Second, “hasn’t been refuted” isn’t the standard by which the veracity of any assertion or allegation is measured. The onus is always on the one making the assertion to provide proof (or even credible evidence) backing the claim.
Feinstein and her STASI/KGB, ‘ You are guilty ! Now try prove you are innocent !’
Wasnt the Trump romp with Prostitutes and the golden shower pretty well debunked?
Dianne Feinstein enjoys having her nipples pinched by African dwarves. I have never read a single statement that will refute this.
She’s been swimming in shxx for so long she can’t smell the stink.
Uh, both Glenn Simpson and Steele themselves have testified to the fact that they did not verify or corroborate the information contained in the dossier.
And as John Solomon stated last night on Laura Ingraham’s program last night it will be proven very shortly that all the information that the FBI relied on in their FIA applications originated from Hillary Clinton.
- Steele Dossier paid by Clinton
- State Dept. (2nd dossier) info from Cody Shearer and Sid Blumenthal (Clinton associates)
- Yahoo news article info originated from Steele
- Australian ambassador who had drunken conversation with George Pappadopoulis has ties to the Clintons
Meaning no information presented to the FISA court was independently verified or corroborated by the FBI/DOJ before applying for the FISA application
They don’t call her “FineSwine” for nothin’.
Check her bank account and lets see if she was paid for saying this...and who paid her? Always follow the money trail when it comes to the FineSwine.
Actually Dianne: ‘Not a single revelation in the Steele dossier has been proved to be TRUE’
Two words - Tutor Perini
two more words - Richard Blum
three words - conflicts of interest
three more words - hi-speed choochoo contract
Corruption is nothing new in the DiChiFi ‘blockchain’
nor is collusion to win massive contracts
that fatten her family larder
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.