Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

What an idiotic suggestion that has nothing to do with anything that I said. Once upon a time, there was a certain amount of honour with people and certain principles flowed from that. What will happen now is that if you leave a door open a crack for the purpose of a principle, it just gets violated. A similar situation exists with Comey and the leaking he did through his friend... now he is going to claim that his friend is his lawyer so that any communication between the two falls under attorney-client privilege provisions. This has nothing to do with wanting to see any pictures (if there are any) and I’ll be happy to leave that to you... since you mentioned it and obviously are somewhat obsessed about the idea. All I care about is that folks not get sucked into this idea that these two were ‘lovers’ as opposed to ‘two adulterous scum on a mission to bring down the president’, and as such they should let them off the hook on releasing their taxpayer paid for texts by claiming a privilege that should never exist. Is that clear enough?


77 posted on 02/09/2018 3:25:40 PM PST by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: hecticskeptic

Relax old man. I was joking. If you want to see more, that’s fine with me.


78 posted on 02/09/2018 3:31:35 PM PST by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson