Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

“The judge issued his ruling Monday, stating it would only be discrimination if Miller refused to sell an existing product to the lesbians. “


Qualifying a refusal to sell as “discrimination” is in itself already tyranny. It let the Pandora box wide open to the grievance industry. If such nonsense was kept away from the law to start with, we will not have all the ensuing stupid litigation.


13 posted on 02/09/2018 9:19:24 AM PST by miniTAX (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: miniTAX

>
“The judge issued his ruling Monday, stating it would only be discrimination if Miller refused to sell an existing product to the lesbians. “
Qualifying a refusal to sell as “discrimination” is in itself already tyranny. It let the Pandora box wide open to the grievance industry. If such nonsense was kept away from the law to start with, we will not have all the ensuing stupid litigation.
>

TY, and spot on.

Baker was spared but the court didn’t swat down the stupid State trampling upon Rights...as usual.


81 posted on 02/09/2018 11:35:19 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson