Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China plans sea-based anti-missile shields ‘for Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean
South China Morning Post ^ | 08 February, 2018 | Minnie Chan

Posted on 02/09/2018 7:23:21 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

China is developing sea-based anti-missile systems and plans to deploy them in the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean, according to military experts.

The assessment came as Beijing announced it had carried out a successful test of its ground-based mid-course defence system on Monday.

Testing of the anti-ballistic missile system that could shield China from a ballistic missile attack is part of efforts to catch up with the top nuclear nations with anti-missile technology, the United States and Russia. China previously carried out tests of the system in 2010 and 2013.

Beijing is also working on a sea-based system for the Asia-Pacific region to breach the cold war era line of containment, according to observers. The “first island chain” is a series of archipelagos lying between China and the world’s largest ocean that Beijing says has been used by the United States as a natural barrier to contain it since the cold war.

“China’s sea-based anti-missile system aims to defend both its territory and overseas interests, because sea-based defence systems will be set up wherever its warships can go,” said Song Zhongping, a military commentator on Phoenix Television. “The first area it will target is the Asia-Pacific region and the Indian Ocean to protect its overseas interests.”

China has been trying to build up a blue-water navy that can operate globally and safeguard its maritime interests. Observers have said Beijing plans to have four aircraft carrier battle groups in service by 2030. And with three-quarters of its oil imports passing through the Indian Ocean or Strait of Malacca, Beijing is looking to boost maritime defence.

“With the US and other countries taking on the Indo-Pacific strategy to counter China, Beijing will definitely deploy anti-missile systems in these areas in response,” said Song, a former member of the People’s Liberation Army’s Second Artillery Corps.

Macau-based military expert Antony Wong Dong said China had developed a new generation sea-based HQ-26 anti-missile system with an ultra long-range 3,500km cruise missile. The system is expected to be installed on the country’s biggest destroyer, the Type 055, which has a maximum displacement of 13,500 tonnes.

Beijing-based naval expert Li Jie said sea-based mid-course interceptors were designed to destroy enemy warheads in space, which is not covered by international law.

The latest mid-course anti-missile test was conducted amid simmering tensions over North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and rising concerns about India’s growing missile capabilities. Military analyst Zhou Chenming said Beijing was sending a message that they were still relatively small nuclear nations.

India successfully tested an Agni-V intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on January 18 that, with a range of 5,000km, could land a nuclear warhead almost anywhere on the Chinese mainland.

And in November, North Korea claimed to have successfully launched a Hwasong-15 ICBM with an estimated range of 13,000km – meaning it could land a nuclear warhead on the US mainland.

“China’s mid-course anti-missile system is powerful enough to shoot down missiles from North Korea and India, though it’s not clear whether it could intercept an ICBM from the US if they start firing at each other,” Zhou said.

He added that China needed anti-missile shields to defend itself.

“The US ... owns 6,800 nuclear warheads, while China has just a few hundred – that’s why Beijing needs to develop anti-missile systems for defence,” Zhou said.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: China ‘planning anti-missile shields across two oceans’China plans anti-missile defence system


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; antimissile; bmd; plan

1 posted on 02/09/2018 7:23:21 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Sink destroyers first ,D’oh


2 posted on 02/09/2018 7:27:23 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Wars are not won on technology alone. Rival states just have to keep ahead of the curve and respond to the latest application by their opponents.


3 posted on 02/09/2018 7:33:58 AM PST by alloysteel (Sometimes I have to tell myself, it just isn't worth the jail time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Our technology stolen/given /sold to them.


4 posted on 02/09/2018 7:52:34 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

This is stupid, you can’t hit a bullet with a bullet </Reagan era treasonous democrat>


5 posted on 02/09/2018 7:57:52 AM PST by null and void (What do the democrats stand for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella

Clinton gave it all.


6 posted on 02/09/2018 8:35:12 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Boom...problem solved.


7 posted on 02/09/2018 8:39:26 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thank you Loral Space Systems in Redwood City California..!

Nice job, people will die.


8 posted on 02/09/2018 8:42:42 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why do folks believe China ABMs will work better than ours?


9 posted on 02/09/2018 10:02:07 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson