To: EdnaMode
After all this clearly seditious information, why hasn’t a special prosecutor has not been named? What possible reason is there now not a reason to name a special prosecutor to investigate this?
32 posted on
02/07/2018 9:25:57 AM PST by
Obadiah
To: Obadiah
I am with you. I don’t get it either.
38 posted on
02/07/2018 9:28:26 AM PST by
rlmorel
(Leftists: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
To: Obadiah
Right now Sessions is obstructing every single investigation. Why would he allow a Special Counsel. That would be completely against his own interests.
48 posted on
02/07/2018 9:32:45 AM PST by
DrDude
To: Obadiah
What possible reason is there now not a reason to name a special prosecutor to investigate this? I am pretty sure Sessions remarked that it was not his job to protect the President.
75 posted on
02/07/2018 9:52:32 AM PST by
itsahoot
(As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
To: Obadiah
Good question,.......goes along with the other question many of us are ask: ......IS SESSIONS PART OF THE SWAMP?
106 posted on
02/07/2018 10:10:12 AM PST by
Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
(Meuller, Comey, Wray, Strock, Rosenstein,......co-conspirators to Obstruct Justice & treason)
To: Obadiah
After all this clearly seditious information, why hasn’t a special prosecutor has not been named? What possible reason is there now not a reason to name a special prosecutor to investigate this?Ask Sessions.
To: Obadiah; rlmorel
We don’t need a special prosecutor. A special prosecutor is reserved for AGs who will not or cannot function in their positions. Either Sessions is going to do his job or President Trump is going to fire his sorry a&&. Enough of this sissy footing around!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson