Full headline: "Newsweek fires editor-in-chief, deputy editor and 3 reporters in possible retaliation for negative coverage "
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: markomalley
Newsweek hasn’t been relevant for years.
To: markomalley
Isn’t that about 90% of their employees these days?
To: markomalley
If they did this 6 month or a year ago..good job!
4 posted on
02/05/2018 10:58:58 AM PST by
Leep
(The dims better watch it..Trump is CRAZY!!)
To: markomalley
Schadenfreude.............
5 posted on
02/05/2018 10:59:23 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
To: markomalley
I guess they didn’t wade far enough into the swamp.
7 posted on
02/05/2018 10:59:36 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: markomalley
Newsweek fires editor-in-chief, deputy editor and 3 reporters in possible retaliation for negative coverage
8 posted on
02/05/2018 11:00:09 AM PST by
Navy Patriot
(America returns to the Rule of Law)
To: markomalley
I’m guessing sexual harassment.
9 posted on
02/05/2018 11:00:35 AM PST by
Brilliant
To: markomalley
..oh, and because of negative Trump coverage
10 posted on
02/05/2018 11:00:52 AM PST by
Leep
(The dims better watch it..Trump is CRAZY!!)
To: markomalley
Feel good post of the day.
12 posted on
02/05/2018 11:01:22 AM PST by
Huskrrrr
To: markomalley
Newsweak is still in bidness?
15 posted on
02/05/2018 11:03:24 AM PST by
Paladin2
(e)
To: markomalley
They don’t need editors and reporters anymore. They just reprint DNC talking points.
16 posted on
02/05/2018 11:05:21 AM PST by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: markomalley
Hellooo? Anybody out there?
According to the story, it is NOT about content related interests, but according to the other link in the story it’s investigating some financial hankie panky, and it’s part of a longer running Manhattan DA investigation into corporate economic corruption.
19 posted on
02/05/2018 11:08:39 AM PST by
RitaOK
(n)
To: markomalley
Newsweek? Wasnt that a little magazine about fifty years ago?
20 posted on
02/05/2018 11:10:09 AM PST by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
24 posted on
02/05/2018 11:14:44 AM PST by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: markomalley
The two editors were overseeing a Newsweek investigation into the magazine parent company’s financial affairs and its possible connection to Olivet University.
26 posted on
02/05/2018 11:21:51 AM PST by
tapatio
(In memory of my Dad 5-27-26 2-4-2010 and Mom 4-20-26 12-8-2012)
To: markomalley
27 posted on
02/05/2018 11:21:53 AM PST by
COUNTrecount
(If only Harvey Weinstein's bathrobe could talk.)
To: markomalley; ransomnote; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...
wouldn’t it be crazy if they released a statement:
“We have determined that there are millions of people out there who don’t even look at our reports because they can’t trust us.
Therefore, we have committed to a new path - we will report the facts, all of the facts, and not make any commentary.”
28 posted on
02/05/2018 11:22:44 AM PST by
bitt
(We dont need an electric chair, we need electric bleachers.)
To: markomalley
37 posted on
02/05/2018 12:14:56 PM PST by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
To: markomalley
40 posted on
02/05/2018 12:26:04 PM PST by
Fido969
(In!)
To: markomalley
Is it the one that was sold for $1.00?
41 posted on
02/05/2018 12:37:58 PM PST by
ontap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
