Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
The FBI has the "Woods protocol" that supposedly prohibits presenting FISC with unverified statements.

So true. The issue I see with this is, the FBI lied by omission to the FISC and those involved should be prosecuted. Clearly an abuse of the court and the only way the FISC could ever regain the trust the American people have put into it is to remove the judge (followed by possible criminal charges) and prosecute the FBI agents involved with the FISA request.

17 posted on 02/05/2018 9:42:38 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: rjsimmon
I see the court as unwitting patsies, not offenders. FISA system is radically different from criminal warrants. The AG/DAG has more a a judge-like role in FISA, than the judge has. The courts are involved to make it "look good" and to, on paper, satisfy separation of powers.

The FBI shot itself in the foot with respect to the court. Why should the court trust the FBI? Why should ANYBODY trust the FBI? It won't even publicly admit it screwed up with this warrant. It defends it as righteous.

18 posted on 02/05/2018 9:48:32 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson