One of the known CORRUPT CROOK’s WIFE is an attorney that FIGHTS FOIA requests....can’t remember her name.
Anyone else ntice a change in the Rats PR? For a solid year they have been proclaiming that Mueller would get Trump but all of a sudden it is all we want to now from the Russia investigation is what happened so we can stop it. Seems curious to me. Not that I believe them for a moment, they are after Trump as much as ever but it seems suddenly they cant say so anymore.
We live in a nation where the Director of the FBI writes a memo for himself recording a conversation with another person (the president). There is classified information in those memos. His recollections are his own and he does not advise the other party of the existence of the memos or allow the other party to review the memos for accuracy. It is possible these memos are pure fiction, are incomplete, or are purposefully crafted to create a false impression.
The Director, Mr. Comey, then gives the memos to a third party (a friend) with the express understanding some or all of the information in the memos will be leaked to the press. The friend is not cleared to receive classified information. In addition, the memos themselves may legally be government documents which Mr. Comey is not authorized to release without approval. The unauthorized, and possibly illegal, transfer of these memos to a third party and the press set in motion a series of events which have resulted in a constitutional crisis. Central to that constitutional crisis is a claim the election of the current president of the United States, by the people of the individual states, is not legitimate.
Subsequently the memos have been seen by a variety of public officials including the special prosecutor, Mr. Mueller, politicians from both political parties, members of the media, and likely many other people including foreign governments through their spying operations. Yet a federal judge rules the American people cannot see these memos central to the claims the election was rigged and illegitimate.
How does one individual, a federal judge, have the audacity to deny the people access to government documents which are freely accessible to hundreds of people, including the press, and which can be freely shared by any of those with access to them. Perhaps it is long past time the people bring out the tar, feathers, and pitchforks to challenge the arrogance of the ruling class. We certainly can’t count on our elected representatives in the people’s legislature (Congress) to do their job and reign in the black robed tyrants on the federal bench.
I didn't give them to a "friend".
How about this! Dissolve the FISA Court! It invites corruption. Secret is NEVER GOOD in a Free Society. It;s long past time we started on the road back to being one.
Two Words :
0bama & appointed .
While it is serious enough that the FBI used tainted evidence and arguments to get a spying warrant and the FISA judge may have been truly in the dark about its sources. But this brazen move by Boasberg, himself a FISA judge, begs the question: “Is it possible that FISA judges KNEW the application was tainted, but for malice toward Candidate, and later POTUS Trump, they approved and granted the warrant anyhow, for their own political reasons?” I submit, as Exhibit-A, the fact that the taint of the warrant app has been revealed, and there is nothing but crickets’ chirping being heard from the direction of the FISA Court!
ROD ROSENSTEIN is America's Attorney General
I’d like the FISA judges who ruled to approve the warrants called before Congress to testify under oath about what was presented by the government. NO complicit party should escape examination. None.