Posted on 02/05/2018 2:22:05 AM PST by markomalley
I think it’s Rosenstein’s wife who fights FOIA requests.
Well, it was also recently decided that the “friend”, who was not referred to as “lawyer” during congressional testimony, would be the “lawyer” to try and hide details of unprivileged conversation under legal privilege. (IMO)
ROD ROSENSTEIN is America's Attorney General
Agree.
That would be GREAT!
Exactly. There is a reason this was recently discovered.
The privilege exerted may be open to challenge. In Comey’s case there is a possibility that the privilege would fail for the reason you gave, but also that the “attorney” took documents subject to the “privileged” discussion and passed them on to a party outside the attorney-client relationship and was not used in furtherance of the privilege.
For example, in a tort case, the attorney sends medical report brought to him by client to a doctor to get professional opinion as to the client’s condition. That report to doctor would be privileged. In Comey’s case, he purposely wanted the contents of the documents to be put into the public domain in order to help get a SP appointed to go after Trump. Even if he loses on the contents of the documents, he wants any conversations with the “attorney” to be protected. The “attorney” also has reason for wanting the privilege to be asserted.
Comey’s “attorney” may himself become a witness. And Comey may have to hire other lawyer$$$ to try to protect his asserted (sham) privilege.
Not sure if it was argued that the documents held by Mueller were in fact dislosed previously and surreptitiously by Comey to the public via the attorney, and therefore the claim that they were not subject to FOIA protection as Comey as FBI director put them in the public domain. He cannot pick and choose the “public” under FOIA.
Thanks markomalley.
The judge’s ruling will make it hard to admit them as evidence.
Yes...Rosenstein is CORRUPT!
I’d like the FISA judges who ruled to approve the warrants called before Congress to testify under oath about what was presented by the government. NO complicit party should escape examination. None.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.