Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
Since Social Security is the contributor's money to begin with, it seems reasonable to "allow" them to take some of it for parental leave.

It is ludicrous for employers to have to pay staff for weeks' worth of unproductive time just because the employee had a baby. If women want to compete against men in the workplace, then they have to play by the same rules.

And no, the answer is NOT to pay "paternity leave." That is simply pandering to the lowest common denominator.

32 posted on 02/03/2018 7:47:42 AM PST by IronJack (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack

Would they get paid for all three months they are off, do you know?
I had double hernia surgery and my boss pressured me to be back after a long weekend, though I had trouble walking.
This is the only `clinker’ in his SOTU address, maybe one or two more in an otherwise outstanding speech.
(Upside, I have a bulletproof kevlar groin now, heh.)


39 posted on 02/03/2018 9:07:08 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all white armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

Paternity leave should be available for all fathers to the exact same extent that maternity leave is available for all mothers based on an equal right to parenting time.


48 posted on 02/03/2018 10:02:35 AM PST by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson