[1Old Pro]

it may just mean that a professional who has spent a career maintaining the confidentiality of investigations wants to continue to do that in this case.

Too late, the damage is done and one guy retiring isn't "accountability" for what has occurred.

[Lagmeister]

Protecting someone's image doesn't measure up to treasonous behavior that needs the light of day. Ever since this 'memo' surfaced it's been about government protecting government under the flimsy guise of national security. Since when hiding corruption and the protection of a public image a part of national security.

If this doesn't come out in full force then complete corruption from everyone is proven.