[Does so]

Sean delivers all the time — more than any other. I appreciate him.

Much of the time, I'm listening with only one ear, anyway. Daily repetition by significant guests helps to keep the information alive. If he's being criticized for building suspense, he can be forgiven: the Bolsheviks have successfully scared-off his advertisers.

[Sa-teef]

Sean says he'll NEVER EVER EVER run with an anonymous New York Slimes source. But he is parroting the anonymous story from WaPo about Strzok and Page being lovers almost every day. And now it turns out that they may have planted that story themselves through a former WSJ writer who moved to the WaPo, according the recent Townhall article by Sundance. We all fell for that one, even though it is the only known source of the rumor.

I find Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham interesting and thought provoking but Sean Hannity is so full of repetitive dagma and self-promoting drama that I wouldn't walk across the street to hear him speak. If you enjoy his drivel, good for you. But I feel fine supporting the President's MAGA program and don't need the pragmatism of Sean Hannity.

[TexasGator]

“If he’s being criticized for building suspense, “

He is not building suspense when most are yawning ...