That is not the reason for my post. What Im saying is that Big Pharma wants it prohibited because they cant compete with it. The tactics of big Pharma are not free enterprise, they throw enormous sums of money at congress critters to maintain the status quo...
“...What I’m saying is that Big Pharma wants it prohibited because they can’t compete with it. ...”
Another variation on “Lack of evidence for the existence of a conspiracy is evidence for the existence of a conspiracy.”
Non-falsifiable hypotheses tell us nothing about the argument at hand.
They do, however, provide hints about the thought processes of people who post them in defense of a line of argument.