After that, she said later on:
“Our Constitution does not allow for cruel and unusual punishment. If it did, I have to say, I might allow what he did to all of these beautiful souls—these young women in their childhood—I would allow someone or many people to do to him what he did to others.”
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/01/larry-nassars-victims-deserved-a-judge-like-rosemarie-aquilina.html
Again, I believe most people agree with the sentiment, but it just gives him more ammo for at least a sentencing appeal. Irresponsible.
The ethics on both her statements are off-the-charts abominable.
So the only thing preventing her from assigning convicts to be actually an in-fact raped as punishment is the 8th? If that - and not the fact that behaving in such a manner undermines the very idea of justice under law - is all that restrains her, she is a grossly inappropriate individual to be judging others.
Looks like a complete drunk in the publicity photo too.
She’s probably providing fodder for the writers of the inevitable TV movie that is to come. Perhaps she will mount a campaign to play herself in this coming Lifetime movie?