Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter; ransomnote; JockoManning; grey_whiskers
why the near-religious devotion

Now that's just koo koo talk. And damn near as insulting as calling it a cult, or telling you that you demand proof of God's existence which you STILL won't let go of. I will forgive you because I get what you're TRYING to say and don't have the energy to throw a fake hissy like you did.

It’s true that I’ve followed Q from the beginning. Most of the Q threads I read are on The_Donald.

Well there's a new fact. You have never said that, that I'm aware of. Then you have seen more facts than I have. I give your opinion more respect now. I still wonder how I can be so religiously fanatical in my cult like belief and you are not, given my lesser knowledge. It's a puzzlement. If all his Q claims were instantly debunked at the source, which is 8chan, not The Donald. They are different things right? I'm a terrible internetter, I admit. If they were instantly debunked in real time, why does everybody still believe it. Is everybody stupid? All the nerds on 8chan are idiots?

But then I keep thinking there MUST be something I’ve missed. There simply has to be some insight or prediction that slipped passed me.

Then the proper place for you to discover if you missed anything would be at the source. Not here. Go to the site where the Q discussion originally takes place. I forget the name of it. G something I think. Others can tell you. I get it all from here. Bad internetter, remember? Go dabble amongst the weaponized autists. That's all I can tell ya. to tell the ruth, people here are several light years behind them nerds.

Why is it so offensive to merely inquire as to the most convincing information Q has revealed?

Honestly. It's your approach. Also, you are lumped in with the herd of other aggressive, hostile deniers. Maybe through no fault of your own. Just human nature. I'm telling you. Get Jocko one on one if she will have you. She will give you good info. Better yet, if you can get Ransomnote, our cult leader, to give you a few minutes, she may be best of all. But she is extremely busy doing what she does. And that's a lot. If you mail her politely, she may help you. I hope you're being sincere. Try everybody I pinged, Maybe you'll get a nibble.

Question.

Are you trying to wear me down? Can't. I'm the lovin man. I can go all day and all night and then some.

475 posted on 01/23/2018 2:47:38 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

I’ll stick with my centipede Q threads. I didn’t realize it until I posted on this thread, but The_Donald discussions are far more informative. Those posters have an overwhelming predisposition toward facts. I could link you to a centipede thread sometime, but I doubt you’d like it. They are realists, and harder to fool than the Vulcan.


487 posted on 01/23/2018 3:07:33 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

Just two more things. One:

‘Asked and answered. You are being repetive now. Scroll up for my responses (more than one) to that.’

Untrue. In your most recent post you had just asked what evidence there was that Q had never addressed the cataclysmic failure of his first three predictions. I answered you, and you came back with the above—totally inaccurate and unwarranted.

‘Then the proper place for you to discover if you missed anything would be at the source.’

This same old same old dodge gets old. I post here, and everyone says I don’t know what I’m talking about. [Though as it turned out I knew more than the self-styled experts.] These threads are crawling with Q devotees. If he’d ever said anything of true significance, here is *precisely* the place to inquire about it AND receive a civil, responsive answer.

That is the entire point. A person comes onto a thread teeming with Q acolytes and asks an immanently reasonable question. [For which *you,* of all people, blame me. There should never be anything offensive about an honest question, period.]

If Q had ever said anything truly convincing, his supporters would be falling all over themselves to give me the link and the quote. You tell me you’re as smart as I am. [99th percentile, here.] Then why is this difficult for you? If Q’s most devoted fans cannot supply even one significant, persuasive quote, then it’s a scam. That is so basic. I’m convinced that if you really think about it, you will agree.

I’ve seen the latest Q posts. Happy to see that more are waking up and acknowledging there’s no there there. May the trend continue.

Best, FW


532 posted on 01/24/2018 3:05:31 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson