None that I'm aware of. See my above post for possible alternative explanations.
Two, if circumstances changed, why would Q not have made some allusion to this?
I would have to be Q to answer that. I am not Q. Or am I?
Why would Q act as if the predictions had never been made?
What evidence do you have that I, I mean he "acted as if...?"
Why not *something,* as opposed to nothing?
It's none of your business?
Wouldn’t you ask why at least *one* of the predictions didn’t pan out?
No. I would call you a LARPER and make fun of you till you cried. OR I would make no assumptions and look at the preponderance of ALL the evidence and evaluate THAT and take everything on balance and use my big, giant Bagster brain and reach whatever conclusion I reached. I would most DEF not judge the entirety of information on ONE piece of information. THAT is illogical.
I have no patience with irrationality.
You gotta do you, goodman.
It’s irrational to imagine Hillary was arrested and no one had a clue.
Remember. Indictment is not arrest so stop saying that. You are overstating your argument. See also my previous alternative possibilities.
It’s also irrational to posit that Q is on the up and up, but he couldn’t give even the vaguest clue why his predictions failed.
Disagree. There can be many rational explanations for this point. You refuse to consider them.
Once it gets into irrational territory, I am unable in good faith to buy it.
Consider that you may be wrong. Consider there are things you aren't seeing or haven't seen. Consider the totality of the evidence. Consider that I'm just like you and I believe. How can that be possible. Of course I'm not JUST like you, you will say. But I believe in a general sense, that I am. What could possibly convince someone who thinks like you (maybe skosh better :) ) to believe something you consider irrational.
Consider all this. And then reevaluate. The possibility exists that, if you give it a fair look, you will change your position.
I reiterate that I'm a poor choice to lay out the evidence for you. I wish I was better. I just KNOW I could convince you. This is the best I got. Come on dude. Make me a winner. I can win a cruise.
‘Remember. Indictment is not arrest so stop saying that. You are overstating your argument.’
I posted Q’s exact quote. He said “arrested,” not indicted. He gave the day and nearly the hour. Nothing happened.
Q never alluded to his failed predictions. That is the evidence that he acted as if nothing had happened. Why should anyone trust him after that?
You have the patience of Job and then some.