You say if anybody, Podesta, Huma, Hillary, had been indicted then we would know about it. I believe the possibility exist that we do not necessarily know. For us to know,somebody would have illegally leaked the information or the "indictees" themselves would have to. They have every motivation not to leak on themselves (made a funny).
It is also possible that indictments and even arrests were planned when Q made his "prediction" and something happened to call them off. That is the possibility I would think more probable. Anyway. I will not discount the whole of Q based on one so called "debunked" statement in the face of so many bunked ones. And don't ask me to list them because, like I said, I am not the expert. Others can do that much better than I. What put me over the edge to one hundred percent belief was the video of the Donald's speech about "the coming storm" when he made a Q sign with his hand. Have you seen that?
I am not a Q scholar. I am a soldier. I handle comms and "troll" rasslin. We all do what we are best at in this cult, goodman.
I recommend you talk with Grey Whiskers for a good factual run down. He's a bit grumpy if approached wrong. Tell him I sen ya. Maybe a polite mail would be best? I also recommend Jocko Manning consultation in private. She is much more patient and might be the wiser choice. They are both warrior/priests in the cult and are very wise.
I would really like you on our side. Honestly. We need clever boys. And you ARE a clever boy.
Two questions. One, what evidence is there that any secret Q-predicted indictments have occurred.
Two, if circumstances changed, why would Q not have made some allusion to this? It’s pertinent. Q made three very high profile predictions. None were fulfilled. Why would Q act as if the predictions had never been made? You know how good he is with veiled hints. Why not *something,* as opposed to nothing?
If I made three big, bold predictions to you, and all three fell through, would that be the end of it? Or would you ask me what happened? Wouldn’t you ask why at least *one* of the predictions didn’t pan out?
I have no patience with irrationality. It’s irrational to imagine Hillary was arrested and no one had a clue. It’s also irrational to posit that Q is on the up and up, but he couldn’t give even the vaguest clue why his predictions failed. Once it gets into irrational territory, I am unable in good faith to buy it.